The
slide to be stained for
CD117 comprised:
1. Appendix, 2. Liver, 3-4. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST),
5. Desmoid tumour.
All tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin.
Criteria for assessing a CD117 staining as optimal included:
- A strong and distinct predominantly
membranous but also cytoplasmic staining of the Cajal cells in the
appendiceal muscularis propria.
- A moderate to strong, distinct staining
of the majority of the neoplastic cells of the two GISTs.
- A negative reaction of the desmoid tumour.
- A strong staining of mast cells in all
specimens.
- A generally negative staining of all other
cells (in particular smooth muscle cells). However, a weak to
moderate, diffuse or granulated cytoplasmic
reaction in the appendiceal enterocytes and liver cells was
accepted, as it did not interfere with the interpretation of the
specific staining.
118 laboratories submitted stains. At the
assessment 42 achieved optimal marks (36 %), 50 good (42 %), 16
borderline (14 %) and 10 poor marks (8 %).
The following Abs were used:
mAb clone T595 (Novocastra, n=1)
rmAb clone 9.7 (Ventana, n=5)
pAb A4502 (Dako, n=109)
pAb CMC766 (Cell Marque, n=1)
pAb RB-1518 (NeoMarkers, n=1)
pAb sc-168 (Santa Cruz, n=1)
Optimal staining for CD117 in this assessment
was only obtained with the pAb clone A4502 (42 out of 109).
A4502: All the protocols
giving an optimal result were based on heat induced epitope
retrieval (HIER) using Tris-EDTA/EGTA pH 9 (29/61)*, Cell
Conditioning 1 (BenchMark, Ventana) (6/19), Citrate pH 6 (2/12),
Bond Epitope Retrieval Solution 2 (Bond, Leica-microsystems) (1/3),
Bond Epitope Retrieval Solution 1 (Bond, Leica-microsystems) (1/1),
EDTA/EGTA pH 8 (1/6) or 1mM EDTA pH9 (1/1) as heating buffer. The mAb
was typically diluted in the range of 1:50 – 1:1.000 depending on
the total sensitivity of the protocol employed. Using these protocol
settings 79 out of 97 (81 %) laboratories produced a sufficient
staining (optimal or good).
In 6 protocols, HIER was omitted. Of these, 3 were marked as good
and 3 as borderline.
* (number of optimal results/number of
laboratories using this buffer)
The most frequent causes of insufficient
staining were:
- Less successful primary antibody
- Too low concentration of pAb A4502
- Too high concentration of pAb A4502
- Insufficient epitope retrieval - HIER in citrate pH 6.0 or
EDTA/EGTA pH8 with too short heating time, or omission of HIER.
In this assessment and in concordance with the
results in the previous
run 14 2005, the prevalent features of an insufficient staining
were either a weak/false negative or a false positive reaction in the
specimens. The weak/false negative reaction was primarily seen in
the appendiceal Cajal
cells and the two GISTs (typically appearing with too low
concentration of primary Ab or insufficient/missing HIER). The false positive reaction was typically
seen in the smooth muscle cells in the appendix (typically appearing
with protocols using a too high concentration of the primary Ab).
In 5 laboratories a distinct reaction of the neoplastic cells of the
desmoid tumour was observed. The protocol settings in these 5
laboratories were identical to the laboratories not demonstrating
the neoplastic cells in the desmoid tumour. This aberrant reaction
in the desmoid was also noticed in run 14 and could not be
explained at that time. However, it has now been revealed that in 3 of the 5 laboratories,
the same A4502 lot OHO12A was used
in the two runs with identical reactions in
the desmoids. In a re-test in the NordiQC lab the reaction pattern
with lot OHO12A has been confirmed.
Appendix is an appropriate control for CD117:
The Cajal cells must show a distinct reaction, while the smooth
muscle cells in muscularis propria must be negative.
CD117 was also assessed in runs 7 and 14.
The proportion of insufficient results has been reduced from 38 % in
run 7 2003 to 22 % in the present run. Specific
recommendations have been given to 35 laboratories with insufficient
results in the two previous runs. 21 laboratories
followed the recommendations and 15 of these (71%) improved. Six did not follow the
recommendations and 2 of these (33%) improved. Two laboratories
changed their entire system resulting in a sufficient result.
Conclusion
pAb A4502 is an appropriate CD117 Ab for the
identification of GIST.
HIER, preferable in an alkaline buffer, is mandatory to obtain an
optimal result. Concentration of the primary Ab should be carefully
calibrated.
Appendix is an appropriate control for CD117: The Cajal cells must show a distinct reaction, while the smooth muscle cells in
muscularis propria are negative.
It has to be further elucidated if a lot-to-lot variation can cause
an aberrant CD117 reaction in desmoids and similar tumours. |