|
The
slide to be stained for Neurofilament protein
(NFP)
comprised:
1. Appendix, 2. Brain, 3. Carcinoid, 4. Neuroblastoma, 5. Adrenal gland.
All specimens were fixed in 10 % NBF.
Criteria for assessing a NFP staining as optimal was highly
depending on the antibody used and included:
-
A strong, distinct staining of
normal axons (appendix, brain, adrenal gland, neuroblastoma) with
mAb clone 2F11, and a heterogeneous staining
with mAb cocktail of clones NFP7/DA2/RMd020.11.
-
A strong, distinct staining of
perikarya/ganglion cells (appendix, brain) with clones
NFP7/DA2/RMd020.11, a moderate, distinct staining with clone 2F11.
-
A distinct, heterogeneous staining of the carcinoid,
neuroblastoma and adrenal gland (cortical zona glomerulosa and
medullary phaeochromocytes) with clones NFP7/DA2/RMd020.11,
while virtually no
staining with clone 2F11.
57 laboratories
participated in the assessment.
One used an inappropriate antibody. Among the remaining 56
laboratories, 15 achieved optimal marks (27 %) ,
31
good (55 %), 9 borderline (16 %) and 1 (2 %) poor marks.
The following Abs were used:
mAb clone
2F11 (Dako, n=43; Euro-Diagnostica, n=3; Ventana, n=2, Maxin,
n=1, Monosan, n=1, Neomarkers, n=1; Sanbio, n=1)
mAb
cocktail of clones NFP7/DA2/RMd020.11 (Zymed, n=4)
With clone
2F11 an optimal staining result in this assessment was
obtained in 13 out of 52 cases (25%). A further 31 laboratories
obtained good marks. Thus a total of 44 staining results were
sufficient (84%).
All protocols giving optimal results were based on Heat Induced Epitope Retrieval
(HIER) in Tris-EDTA/EGTA pH 9 (9 of 30 were optimal), Cell
conditioning 1 (Ventana CC1; 2
of 5 were optimal), EDTA pH9 (1 of 1 was optimal, Citrate pH6 (1 of
12 was optimal - after staining over-night) and Target retrieval
solution (Dako TRS) pH 9.9 (1 of 1 was optimal).
The Ab dilution ranged from 1:25 - 1:2,000
depending on the total sensitivity of the system employed. No protocols using
proteolytic pretreatment or omitting pretreatment resulted in an
optimal stain.
With
mAb cocktail of clones NFP7/DA2/RMd020.11
an optimal staining result in this assessment was obtained in 2/4. Both used HIER. The Ab dilution
ranged from 1:50 - 1:300.
The most frequent causes of insufficient
staining were:
- Too low concentration of the primary
antibody
-
Insufficient HIER (citrate buffer),
- Inappropriate
epitope retrieval (proteolysis)
- Omission
of epitope retrieval
-
Too high Ab concentration and/or endogenous biotin reaction causing
false positive staining of epithelial cells and lymphocytes.
Almost all laboratories were able to demonstrate
the cerebral nerves and large nerves of the appendix, while in the
suboptimal protocols using clone 2F11, the small axons of the appendiceal muscularis propria,
the adrenal gland and among tumour cells in the neuroblastoma were weakly
demonstrated or false negative.
Appendix is a reliable control: the ganglion cells and axons should
show the strongest staining possible without any staining of the
smooth muscle cells or epithelium.
Conclusion
This
was the first assessment of NFP. A specific epitope was not defined,
as we wished to see which antibody was selected by the laboratories
to demonstrate NFP in the multitissue block containing both normal
tissues and tumours (generally known to express mainly
unphosphorylated filaments).
Remarkably, the prevailing
choice of Ab was mAb clone 2F11, which only
decorates phosphorylated filaments generally known to leave the large majority of
neuronal and neuroendocrine tumours unstained. Only four
laboratories used the mAb cocktail of clones NFP7/DA2/RMd020.11, and
none used clone N52 (Sigma), which may give a strong staining
of some neuronal cells and tumours that are patchy stained or even
negative with the cocktail mentioned above (see photos below).
For
the demonstration of neuronal differentiation in tumours the
laboratories should use mAb clone N52 and mAb cocktail of clones
NFP7/DA2/RMd020.11 in tandem, while mAb clone 2F11 is only useful
for the demonstration of normal axons. |