The
slide to be stained for p63
protein comprised:
1. Tonsil, 2. Esophagus, 3. Breast ductal carcinoma, 4. Prostate
hyperplasia*,
5. Prostate adenocarcinoma.
All specimens were fixed in 10 % NBF.
* An area with prostate adenocarcinoma
was revealed as the block was cut for distribution.Criteria for assessing a p63 staining
as optimal included:
- A strong, distinct nuclear staining in almost all squamous
epithelial cells in the tonsil and esophagus
- A strong, distinct nuclear staining in the basal cells in
the prostate hyperplasia and in areas with prostatic intraepithelial
neoplasia (PIN) in the prostate
adenocarcinoma specimen
- No staining reaction in the secretory cells of the hyperplastic prostate or the prostate
carcinoma
- Only focal nuclear staining reaction in the
breast carcinoma
- No or only a week staining reaction of the smooth muscle cells.
68 laboratories submitted stains. At the assessment 42
obtained optimal marks (62 %), 14 good (21 %), 9 borderline
(13 %) and 3 poor marks (4 %).
The following Abs were used:
mAb clone 4A4 (Dako, n=47; BioCare, n=4; NeoMarkers, n=3;
Diagnostic Biosystems, n=1; Becton Dickinson, n=1; BioGenex, n=1; Biologo, n=1; Santa Cruz, n=1)
mAb clone 4A4 + Y4A3 (NeoMarkers, n=5)
mAb clone 7JUL (Novocastra, n=4)
Optimal staining for p63 in this assessment was obtained with the
mAbs clone A4A (38 out of 59) and clones 4A4 + Y4A3
(4 out of 5).
All optimal protocols were based on Heat Induced Epitope Retrieval
(HIER).
Using the clone 4A4, HIER in Tris-EDTA/EGTA pH 9 (33 out of 39),
Citrate pH 6 (3 out of 8), EDTA/EGTA pH 8 (1 out of 2), and
CC1/Ventana (1 out of 8) gave an optimal staining. The clone 4A4 was
typically used in the range of 1:25 – 1:800 depending on the total
sensitivity of the protocol employed. One laboratory used 4A4 as a
ready-to-use Ab.
Using the clone 4A4 + Y4A3 optimal staining was obtained with HIER
in Tris-EDTA/EGTA pH 9 (3 out of 3) and Citrate pH 6 (1 out of 2).
The clone 4A4 + Y4A3 was typically used in the range of 1:200–
1:1600 depending on the total sensitivity of the protocol employed.
The most frequent causes of insufficient
stains were:
- Too low concentration of the primary antibody
- A less successful primary Ab
- Insufficient or excessive HIER.
In the assessment the prevalent feature of an insufficient staining
was a too weak or false negative reaction of the basal cells
in the hyperplastic prostate. The
majority was capable of detecting p63 in the squamous epithelial cells
in the tonsil and esophagus. However, in the insufficient staining
the reaction typical was relatively weak with only the basal layer
distinctively demonstrated. In general using i.e. tonsil as a
positive control, the immunohistochemical reaction for p63 should be
calibrated to give a staining as strong as possible without any or
with only a weak cytoplasmic reaction. In a few laboratories where the
staining reaction was too strong, this was typically accompanied by a
cytoplasmic reaction in germinal centre macrophages.
Conclusion
- The mAbs clone A4A and
A4A+Y4A3 are useful Abs for p63
- HIER is required for an optimal performance
of both Abs.
An appropriate
control for p63 is tonsil, in which
all
squamous epithelial cells should give a strong nuclear staining
reaction (without cytoplasmic reaction). |