 The
slide to be stained for
CD30
comprised:
1.
Tonsil, 2.
Hodgkin's lymphoma NS, 3. Anaplastic
large cell lymphoma, 4. Embryonal
carcinoma, 5. Choriocarcinoma.
Criteria for assessing a
CD30
staining as optimal included:
A distinct membranous staining of activated B- and T-cells in the
tonsil, the anaplastic large cell lymphoma, the embryonal carcinoma
and the choriocarcinoma as well as a strong and a distinct membranous
and dot-like (Golgi) staining of the Reed-Sternberg and Hodgkin’s
cells in the Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
74 laboratories submitted stainings. At the
assessment 32 achieved optimal staining (43 %), 36 good (49 %), 3
borderline (4 %) and 3 (4 %) poor staining.
The following Abs were used:
clone Ber-H2 (DakoCytomation, n=66; Ventana, n=4; NeoMarkers, n=1;
Zymed, n=1)
clone 1G12 (Novocastra, n=1)
clone HRS-4 (Immunotech, n=1)
In this assessment optimal stainings could
only be obtained with clone Ber-H2. However, this was used by all
but two of the laboratories.
In the optimal protocols all used HIER. With Tris-EDTA/EGTA pH 9 as
the heating buffer, 26 out of 54 obtained an optimal result, with
Citrate pH 6 it was 2 out of 10, with Target Retrieval Solution (DakoCytomation) it was 3 out of 3, and with CC1 (Ventana
Benchmark) it was 1 out of 2 labs.
None of the 5 laboratories using proteolytic pretreatment obtained
an optimal staining, and 3 were insufficient.
Ber-H2 was used in the range of 1:20 – 200 depending on the total
sensitivity of the protocol used.
The majority of laboratories were able to
detect CD30 in the anaplastic large cell
lymphoma and the two carcinomas, whereas the demonstration of CD30
in the activated B and T lymphocytes and Hodgkin’s lymphoma was only
achieved with sensitive protocols.
The most frequent causes of insufficient
stainings were:
- Inappropriate choice of epitope
retrieval (i.e., proteolytic pre-treatment)
- Too low concentration of the primary antibody
|